Actor Michael J Fox, a victim of Parkinson’s disease, made a series of political commercials supporting a series of Democrats for national office. He shook uncontrollably in front of the camera from the ravages of his disease as he delivered this message. If you vote Republican, you end stem cell research and the hope for a cure for his disease. If you vote Democrat, you give him and other victims hope. This is the second disease or malady that the Democrats have handpicked to politicize. The first was the AIDS virus (more on that later).

In the good old days disease was a bipartisan issue. Maladies such as polio, cancer, or muscular dystrophy were tackled with varying degrees of success with the combined efforts of both Democrats and Republicans. In the mid 1980s this all changed when the democrats started politicizing AIDS. It continues today with their politicization of Parkinson’s disease and other neurological disorders such as dementia, Alzheimer’s and paralysis (Remember when Democrat vice-presidential candidate Senator John Edwards said that stem cell research would help paralysis victim Christopher Reeves walk again? PRAISE THE LORD!)

Why did the Democratic Party known for its limitless compassion for society’s victims start handpicking specific ailments? And if they are interested in helping cure diseases, why don’t they choose more common killers such as cancer or cardiovascular disease? The reason is that they are not interested in the ailments or cures. They merely use these dreadful situations as a means to promote veiled agendas. The veiled agenda behind the Parkinson’s commercial was abortion rights. The agenda behind their support of AIDS victims was homosexual political support (money and votes).

So why would they use disease as a way to promote certain rights? Diseases produce victims and victims ensure solid propaganda campaigns. How could you dare vote against the message the Michael J Fox is bringing forth? He is handsome, charismatic, apparently likeable, a talented actor, and suffering through a terrible disease. Doesn’t he deserve hope? The liberals are using Mr. Fox as a human shield to deflect criticism over their abortion agenda.

The amendment Mr. Fox lends his support to in Missouri for instance, is merely an attempt to protect abortion rights. The proponents of abortion are giving victims such as Mr. Fox false hopes for cures through stem cell research. The stubborn fact is that currently there is no scientific evidence pointing to a cure for neurological ailments through the use of stem cells that are harvested from aborted babies. If this is true, why do some people want to continue the research? Simply as a backdoor attempt to ensure that abortion is protected. How are you going to harvest these stem cells and give hope if abortion is outlawed?

The abortion debate in this country is slowly swinging to the pro-life side and the liberals know this. Even liberals such as the Clintons are placing themselves in the political middle of the debate by stating that abortions should be “safe, legal and rare.” (Rare? What other Constitutional right do you have that should be rare? And what about the truly helpless victims of abortion, the babies? -But those are different arguments.) So if you are losing the public argument because your argument does not stand up to intellectual rigor, you must shut down the opposition. What better way than to bring out victims? How dare you doubt the authenticity of Mr. Fox’ suffering.

AIDS. Remember when AIDS broke out in the early 80s? It coincided with a huge move toward gay rights in this country. (Now gays should have every human right and constitutional right that you and I have, but they shouldn’t have special rights such as gay marriage.) The gays where gaining political power in the early 80s with the help of the Democratic Party and nothing was going to get in their way. Not even a terminal, contagious disease.

Historically, one method to deal with killer diseases was through quarantine. Plague, smallpox, and typhoid were all dealt with varying degrees of success by quarantining the victims so that they would not infect others. Well homosexuals were in the middle of a rights struggle and they viewed quarantine as an attempt to promote further discrimination against them. How many ten of thousands of our young men were given a death sentence in this country because it was politically incorrect to quarantine those who already had the virus? How long did our emergency blood supply lay unscreened while this politically sensitive issue was being wrestled with? Democrats who were anxious for the political support of the gay community made homosexuals a special protected class, and this sentenced many of them to death and imperiled all of us.

This dangerous support of the fight against AIDS in exchange for homosexual votes and money even continues today. How much of our limited disease research monies are being spent on AIDS? This is money that could also be spent on the big killers in this country such as cardiovascular disease and cancer. AIDS was not and never has been one of the biggest killers in the country. It is primarily a homosexual disease that was a result of homosexual life choices and activities.

Beware of liberals who claim to be protecting victims of diseases. They are without conscience of the depths that they will sink to victimizing the victims and pushing forth their political agendas. They give false hope to victims of neurological ailments just so they can protect abortion, and they help spread terminal viruses in exchange for votes and political contributions.

Soemthing Ain't Right http://www.somethingaintright.com